New answers tagged area51-meta
5
To be more direct and general about your question: evidence. A list of users that recently joined the site to follow a proposal means very little. We already run checks to make sure there is no irregular voting propping up a proposal when we do our proposal review at the beginning of the commitment phase (or somewhere around that time). If we see a lot of ...
3
You said :
"There could also be voter fraud (meaning people creating multiple accounts and then voting up as many questions to 10 votes as possible)"
But it doesn't make sense. Why would anyone waste time making multiple accounts (when it takes so long to make an account) just to vote multiple times, while the Elrond community is huge? Here is a ...
7
This is because of the volume of recent new followers to the area 51 site.
This is what the official FAQ page says:
A good Q&A site needs a lot of people to support it, so users are asked to invite their friends and help build the community.
This is what we did. The Elrond project has a big community. Maiar was installed 575,000 times! Only one of the ...
13
Elrond Network has one of the strongest community in the blockchain space and massive engagement from both new devs and non-tech folks.
You can check the numbers here -> https://growth.elrond.com/ and just check the Awareness tab.
We have thousands of people in different countries actively contributing on different collaterals and co-projects around ...
9
In my opinion the influx of new users is normal given the fact that the proposal is only 1 week old. Elrond also has a strong community that is increasing day by day, and it is reasonable to deduct that a lot of new users that are interested in the project are coming from those communities.
I do not understand the reason why would you close a proposal that ...
6
I personally would not jump to conclusions without taking into account the entire context.
The way I see it for this particular case, but I feel most points could relate to any topic:
The number of accounts you see are a result of community mobilisation on other platforms which leverage communication, but have the main problem of being intrinsically linear, ...
8
Simply put, an entire Q&A site specifically for a pandemic is not a viable site. We do not create sites for such specific topics, especially one that will eventually pass and become somewhat obsolete in the future. A site only about COVID would never be accepted on our network, regardless of the community behind it.
In general, epidemiology questions are ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
