Skip to main content
added 221 characters in body
Source Link
Mark Rogers
  • 5.8k
  • 21
  • 26

The question could have been posed intentionally off-topic or in jest. It doesn't read very serious to me.

I would think a smart guy like OP Adam Davis wouldn't go around with a handgun on Halloween.

But, of course, you are right, people who respond with unsafe answers on the proposed site should be downvoted or flagged.

From Comments:

...it seems like some sites need an omni-present disclaimer to prevent reckless people from blaming the site. If we ever have legal or medical sites we'll probably need the same thing.

The question could have been posed intentionally off-topic or in jest. It doesn't read very serious to me.

I would think a smart guy like OP Adam Davis wouldn't go around with a handgun on Halloween.

But, of course, you are right, people who respond with unsafe answers on the proposed site should be downvoted or flagged.

The question could have been posed intentionally off-topic or in jest. It doesn't read very serious to me.

I would think a smart guy like OP Adam Davis wouldn't go around with a handgun on Halloween.

But, of course, you are right, people who respond with unsafe answers on the proposed site should be downvoted or flagged.

From Comments:

...it seems like some sites need an omni-present disclaimer to prevent reckless people from blaming the site. If we ever have legal or medical sites we'll probably need the same thing.

Source Link
Mark Rogers
  • 5.8k
  • 21
  • 26

The question could have been posed intentionally off-topic or in jest. It doesn't read very serious to me.

I would think a smart guy like OP Adam Davis wouldn't go around with a handgun on Halloween.

But, of course, you are right, people who respond with unsafe answers on the proposed site should be downvoted or flagged.