Timeline for Is a topic covered by another proposal really supposed to be discouraged?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mechanics.stackexchange.com/ with https://mechanics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jan 23, 2012 at 8:45 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 798 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2012 at 8:39 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @glowcoder Ideally, it should be the narrow site lobbying for separation. In practice, yes, it's up to the proponents of broader site to lobby themselves blue. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 3:52 | comment | added | corsiKa | @Gilles I have read merging season before, but as it was brought up I gave it another pass, and it doesn't seem to address my question. So using the terms "broad site" and "narrow site", should users of the broad site be actively lobbying against the narrow site? | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 1:58 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @KevinVermeer “Merging season” didn't really take; it's more of a “this is how we'd like things to happen but the reality doesn't bear us out”. As for AU/UL/SU, I disagree that it's a debacle. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 1:46 | comment | added | Kevin Vermeer | That merging season blog post is perfect for this answer. You might want to highlight it, quote part of it, or otherwise call it out as required reading and not just support for your statement. Also, the Ask Ubuntu, Unix and Linux, and Superuser debacle probably isn't the best example. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 1:30 | history | answered | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |