I would say no, it wouldn't be a good name. This is supposed to be a site for language learners, and the name reflects that. "Language Overflow" is much more vague - it could be a name of a site for professional linguists, or for people whose hobby is to learn about languages. Here are some more arguments: http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/a/5220/147300 (see "Seriously - sticking the word "Overflow" at the end honestly rolls pretty stupid as a name in 90% or more of situations").

I would say no, it wouldn't be a good name. This is supposed to be a site for language learners, and the name reflects that. "Language Overflow" is much more vague - it could be a name of a site for professional linguists, or for people whose hobby is to learn about languages. Here are some more arguments: https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5220/147300 (see "Seriously - sticking the word "Overflow" at the end honestly rolls pretty stupid as a name in 90% or more of situations").

I would say no, it wouldn't be a good name. This is supposed to be a site for language learners, and the name reflects that. "Language Overflow" is much more vague. Here are some more arguments: http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/a/5220/147300 (see "Seriously - sticking the word "Overflow" at the end honestly rolls pretty stupid as a name in 90% or more of situations").

I would say no, it wouldn't be a good name. This is supposed to be a site for language learners, and the name reflects that. "Language Overflow" is much more vague - it could be a name of a site for professional linguists, or for people whose hobby is to learn about languages. Here are some more arguments: http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/a/5220/147300 (see "Seriously - sticking the word "Overflow" at the end honestly rolls pretty stupid as a name in 90% or more of situations").