Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack OverflowStack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack OverflowStack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

replaced http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/ with https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheoryCSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheoryCSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on MathMath, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

I don't see the point of a cryptography site if it doesn't encompass all aspects of cryptography. The questions deemed on-topic look like they are currently accepted on Math, with perhaps a hint of CSTheory. If that's really the desired scope, the existing sites are fine.

I could see the point of a site that unites all aspects of cryptography, including the math and protocols (currently more Security or CSTheory or Computer Science Stack Overflow material) and implementation (currently Stack Overflow material) and usage (currently Security material).

replaced http://security.stackexchange.com/ with https://security.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading