Timeline for Should proposals of language-specific versions of an existing Stack Exchange site be closed as duplicate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 at 8:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/ with https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Dec 23, 2011 at 14:48 | history | edited | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 93 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2011 at 13:42 | comment | added | Robert Cartaino | @Ivo Flipse: Sites will only be created through the proposal process of Area 51. Right now, there is no localized version of Gaming on the radar... nor is any other localized version of a smaller Stack Exchange site, for that matter. | |
| May 4, 2011 at 5:39 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse | While true, wouldn't it be better to not splinter the attention of some of the smaller SE-sites by creating non-English versions until that one has a real critical mass? By all means, clone SO if that's the only way to grow, but for instance a localized version of Gaming would potentially draw from the 20 questions/day they get. The localized version may not be a duplicate, but they are competing | |
| May 1, 2011 at 18:31 | vote | accept | apaderno | ||
| Apr 30, 2011 at 17:48 | history | answered | Robert Cartaino | CC BY-SA 3.0 |