Timeline for Rebooting Economics.SE site
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 at 19:22 | comment | added | Anton Tarasenko | Surely, it would be better without typical ideological stuff. But economists typically manage to discuss sensitive topics within objective reasoning. (2) Overall, I would like to see a few more comments here by former participants of economics.SE. | |
| Oct 21, 2013 at 19:12 | comment | added | Alecos Papadopoulos | Thanks for the time offer Anton. In principle I agree with non-academic topics, although they have the danger of degenerating into answers that will be just mass media slogans. Perhaps we could create a tag... "applied theory" for these questions, and "press" the answerers to answer questions about current economic issues using the tools and concepts of economics, and not of politics, ideology, or the latest demagogic article of some public figure (even if the latter is a well known economist). | |
| Oct 21, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | Anton Tarasenko | @AlecosPapadopoulos , In addition, I can commit some time to answering questions, but I don't know how econ.SE will do in general. | |
| Oct 21, 2013 at 18:44 | history | edited | Anton Tarasenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 484 characters in body
|
| Oct 21, 2013 at 17:49 | comment | added | Alecos Papadopoulos | Thanks Anton. econ.SE looks great, and "econ" is a standard shortcut for "economics" - more over it has the benefit of covering also "econometrics". I' am all for "econ.SE". | |
| Oct 21, 2013 at 16:47 | history | answered | Anton Tarasenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |