Timeline for Shouldn't Alchoholic Beverages be combined with Beer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 at 17:20 | comment | added | Adam Rackis | @Uooo - if there are not enough users to sustain beer, then let it die out on its own. Let the followers here go over to alcoholic beverages. Why not let things play out on its own. I think a lot of people who already committed (like me) would not have if they had known that a ton of crap from alcoholic beverages was going to be merged in. | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 19:26 | comment | added | Iszi | @Uooo Interestingly, based on the current status of proposals, it looks like Beer is the one that does have a big enough user base on its own. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 12:15 | comment | added | Uooo | You have a seperate page when you have a big enough user base so that a page can exist on it's own. I doubt that "beer" or other specific proposals will be sustainable alone, so I think it would be a good idea to combine them with similar proposals. Like stackoverflow.com does: They don't have a seperate page for each programming language, either. | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 12:02 | comment | added | mdma | then why have separate SE sites at all? Just tag everything. Of course, it's not done like that so where is the dividing line between combining sites with distinct areas and not combining them? | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 7:12 | comment | added | Uooo | That's why you have tags. | |
| Oct 18, 2013 at 17:04 | vote | accept | karancan | ||
| Oct 18, 2013 at 17:05 | |||||
| Oct 18, 2013 at 15:05 | history | answered | mdma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |