Timeline for Lock votes on question to prevent people changing votes when vote count reaches > 10
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 at 15:15 | comment | added | Ryan Frame | @Krishnabhadra: I agree. But since the highly-voted questions are on top, many people will use their five votes before ever getting to something with fewer than ten votes and the proposal will never get anywhere. The beta period will refine the actual definition of a good question; as I understand it the purpose of voting on proposals is to determine if there are enough good questions possible for a site. As long as people only vote on questions that could be a good fit, we don't really need the votes to show which questions are better than the others. | |
| Jul 5, 2013 at 3:08 | comment | added | Krishnabhadra | That again comes back to the original question. Do we only need 40 good questions? Then what is the problem in encouraging users to not to vote on questions that has 10(+) score. A user up vote a question because he found it good for the site. The mere fact that it now has 10 votes doesn't mean he should undo the vote and give it to another not so good but acceptable question. | |
| Jul 4, 2013 at 15:00 | history | answered | Ryan Frame | CC BY-SA 3.0 |