41
votes
Problem with the crypocurrency community
There already is a cryptocurrencies site. The problem is that it's called Bitcoin, not Cryptocurrencies, so users of anything but bitcoin don't realise their questions would be on-topic there.
From ...
- 251
28
votes
Are automatic theorem provers on-topic?
I would prefer to err on the side of inclusiveness, so yes. And the two communities really should be talking to each other more than they do.
- 2,625
24
votes
Should questions about legality be on topic?
Good question, especially in a time when new and confusing regulations are being drafted by the day.
I'm thinking yes. As long as it is prefaced by the disclaimer that this forum isn't responsible ...
- 3,801
24
votes
Are automatic theorem provers on-topic?
Yes
Even if you put all the different branches together, formal methods is a rather niche field, and I don't think there would be so much success having separate sites for ATPs and ITPs. At the same ...
- 151
22
votes
What is on-topic here and not on Writers?
Documentation involves writing, but it isn't writing.
It's interviewing, collating, taxonomizing, maintaining, fixing, updating, expanding, pruning, and more.
The writing aspects of technical ...
- 7,720
20
votes
How does the topic of this site differ from Aviation, Electric Engineering and Robotics?
It differs in that it will have a concentration of people who can answer the questions. In my experience:
Aviation isn't much good at answering questions about the practical applications of ...
- 1,238
19
votes
Accepted
Should Ethics be allowed?
There are two parts to this, and neither is as hard as it sounds.
1. Questions About External Morality
As with any subject of Stack Exchange, it is generally assumed that the target community are ...
- 473
19
votes
Accepted
Will it be strictly reserved to so called "natural products" or will question about GMO products will be also allowed?
I can't think of any reason why a proposal for vegetarianism would be restricted to "natural" products. So-called "unnatural" products are still vegetarian, after all.
- 356
18
votes
Accepted
Should Veganism be extended to Vegetarianism?
Yes, Veganism should be expanded to include Vegetarianism. Previous attempts create a vegan only site have failed. Widening the scope should improve the chance of a successful launch.
- 6,114
18
votes
Accepted
What are the advantages of single language sites over collective ones?
The thing is that Stack Exchange sites are generally defined by an audience and what they approve of/want to here. A good read would be the blog post on the Ubuntu/Linux ‘schism’ or the many answers ...
- 613
18
votes
Why do we need a SynBio.SE when we already have Bio.SE, Bioinformatics.SE and researchgate?
My take on this is two-fold:
First, SynBio is an extremely cross-disciplinary pursuit. This means that often the answer to a question doesn't fall into a category neatly.
For example, my answer to ...
- 616
17
votes
Will this site allow other reduced-meat diets?
The proposal was originally just for Veganism (not just the diet aspect), but after discussion we decided to expand to include Vegetarianism due to many (but not all) overlapping aspects.
If we ...
- 2,465
17
votes
Should questions asking for support for a specific software suite or firmware be on-topic?
This is a very good question. Personally, I feel the answer should be yes... in most cases. I think it is easy to agree that bug reports and associated issues with software packages should go on their ...
- 3,801
16
votes
Accepted
How can this proposal be clearly distinguished from Chemistry, Physics, Computational Science, ...?
Nice to meet you Martin! Before making this proposal, I tried to get in touch with you and orthocresol earlier this week on a chat room I made but wasn't able to grab your attention. One year ago we ...
- 3,573
15
votes
Do programming languages have a place within Conlang discussion, and why or why not?
Possibly… but probably not in way you are implying.
I think calling a conventional programming syntax a "language" in the context of this subject space is playing a bit fast and loose with the ...
- 473
15
votes
Should both language design and language implementation be on-topic?
Yes, both design and implementation should be on-topic
First, the proposal says this:
Programming Language Design
Proposed Q&A site for designers and implementers of computer programming ...
- 560
14
votes
Should we allow questions about other parts of the software toolchain?
Profilers and Debuggers
Questions about creating debuggers and profilers wouldn't be on topic, but questions about exposing debug symbols and memory layout location to a debugger of profiler would be, ...
- 378
13
votes
Accepted
Should book recommendations be on-topic?
No.
Book recommendation questions have a tendency to invite multiple subjective answers and fall under the "primarily opinion-based" close reason which applies on all sites:
Many good questions ...
- 671
13
votes
Should esoteric programming language design be included?
Yes
(Most) Esolangs are definitely programming languages. Also, the very idea of the site itself came from 5 users in the Code Golf Stack Exchange, where we love working on esoteric and golfing ...
- 286
11
votes
Do programming languages have a place within Conlang discussion, and why or why not?
The problem is that all programming languages are constructed (yes, even Common Lisp), so basically anything about programming would be on-topic in this case, since all have to use a (constructed) ...
- 151
11
votes
How does "Programming Language Design and Implementation" overlap with existing SE communities?
This definitely isn't the full picture, but here's the list from which computer science / programming Stack Exchange sites do I post on? annotated with how they might overlap with our site (sites with ...
- 2,334
10
votes
Accepted
Native language should be allow at least in chat groups
This proposal will not work, for several reasons. As mentioned by Ashish and magisch in the comments, it would take a huge amount of money to cover all conceivable languages spoken on Earth (including ...
- 151
10
votes
Will questions about graphical/low code languages be on topic for language design
Yes.
There really doesn't seem any problem with allowing questions from graphical languages in PLD, as after all, they're languages. Besides, as some questions may not go along with text-based ...
- 149
9
votes
Accepted
It's on-topic on Deep Web, so please join the private beta
I agree that there is some overlap, but in a very real way it's like saying that the Raspberry Pi Stack shouldn't exist because the SuperUser Stack already has 1728 Raspberry Pi questions;)
I think ...
- 2,546
9
votes
Accepted
Can we have a Physical Science SE for people with low quality physics questions?
You are mixing up "low quality" and "simple".
Asking why the sky is blue is not necessarily a "low quality" question (for example), the quality of the question depends on how it was asked not it's ...
- 1,297
9
votes
Should we allow questions about the procedure of creating programming languages?
I'd say yes.
The name of the site is literally "Programming language design and implementation". Which sort of tells you that there will be questions about creating (designing) programming ...
- 112
8
votes
Accepted
This would dilute traffic from CS and the DataScience sites
I am not sure about this claim.
Assuming machine learning is part of AI, data science often sees ML as an application of its analysis results (well, I should cite a few books here). The DataScience ...
- 3,467
8
votes
How should we craft the site description for "Technical Communication?"
Edit: Already implemented this change:
Documentation: Proposed Q&A site for information developers, technical
communicators, writers, programmers, engineers, and others interested
or ...
- 3,098
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible