Skip to main content
52 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

I think it's interesting that Robert's post above focus so much on communities - the idea that a site proposal should be made with an existing community in mind is new to me, and none of the site ...
curiousdannii's user avatar
42 votes

Problem with the crypocurrency community

There already is a cryptocurrencies site. The problem is that it's called Bitcoin, not Cryptocurrencies, so users of anything but bitcoin don't realise their questions would be on-topic there. From ...
Aurora0001's user avatar
37 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

Going through the proposal process quickly appears to be a good signal that a proposed site is viable (because failed proposals evaporate, I don't have statistics on how many failed in private beta ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 1,238
26 votes
Accepted

Rushed proposals and Community Moderation

I agree this is a major problem when it happens — but it does have a solution pending, sort of. I've designed a "circuit breaker" which addresses this exact issue; unfortunately, I don't think ...
Robert Cartaino's user avatar
26 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

In short, this undermines anything other than technology sites. And perhaps that's the point, given the structure of how Stack Overflow currently makes money. The site offers a great opportunity ...
JeopardyTempest's user avatar
25 votes

Is anybody out there?

Yes! The community team is keeping an eye on things. Robert has a degree of finesse and warmth that positively can't be replicated or imitated and we know that's going to be missed, but we're going ...
Tim Post's user avatar
  • 1,954
23 votes

Minimum Activity Requirements for Area 51

The "no activity" rule is bad. You're destroying information and contributing to link rot. For example, The Armory, facing imminent failure for spending a year in Definition, was a reboot of an ...
feetwet's user avatar
  • 746
23 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

Translated to English, this proposal is saying "StackExchange doesn't want to participate in building new communities". The community needs to be ready and Area51 doesn't want to be the tool for ...
Tomas's user avatar
  • 501
21 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

This is a reasonable policy to apply to Area51 (although it was done rather abruptly). But Stack Exchange should provide some other process or mechanism to create beta sites that have a good ...
feetwet's user avatar
  • 746
20 votes
Accepted

What does a asterisk (star) in front of a proposal name mean?

The asterisk indicates that a proposal has NOT yet met the Minimum Activity Requirements for Area 51. The asterisk (*) was originally visible to employees only so I could see which proposals were ...
Robert Cartaino's user avatar
19 votes
Accepted

Minimum number of people for a successful proposal

The minimum number of people needed to build a site depends largely on how engaged your users are and how much participation they are willing to put into it. When you submit a proposal for a site, it ...
Robert Cartaino's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Why is Area 51 NOT counted as a valid site for the commitment phase?

Part of the Area 51 process is finding people familiar with the network model and know how other sites on our network operate. That experience is necessary in order for a new site to function properly....
animuson's user avatar
  • 736
16 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

Hopefully these changes will help, but I am skeptical. The real issue is addressed in https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1. Most ...
Rubellite Fae's user avatar
16 votes

What constitutes flagging a proposal?

Elrond Network has one of the strongest community in the blockchain space and massive engagement from both new devs and non-tech folks. You can check the numbers here -> https://growth.elrond.com/ ...
Marius Grigoras's user avatar
14 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

Hmm, just an observation, but it turns out my hypothetical scenario in the comments actually ended up being true. This proposal was closed for being just three commitments short of the required 200. ...
damryfbfnetsi's user avatar
12 votes

How quickly can a proposal go into private beta?

I'd say that the move from proposal to commitment for the Monero proposal was only so fast because we've had a failed proposal already. Bolstered by that failure, the community was determined not to ...
fluffyponyza's user avatar
  • 2,546
11 votes
Accepted

Overlap with The Workplace

Does Stack Exchange have a policy… Yes, we do. See Respect the community - your own, and others’ TL;DR version — if two (or more) communities overlap in scope, nobody is granted "...
Robert Cartaino's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Would Area51 Be More Effective Without Down Votes?

Unfortunately, no — Area 51 would not be more effective without down-votes under the current process. Yes, we might be able to push more proposals through, but without a means of expressing ...
11 votes

Why were the proposals for "SARS-CoV-2 pandemic" deleted?

Simply put, an entire Q&A site specifically for a pandemic is not a viable site. We do not create sites for such specific topics, especially one that will eventually pass and become somewhat ...
animuson's user avatar
  • 736
11 votes

What constitutes flagging a proposal?

In my opinion the influx of new users is normal given the fact that the proposal is only 1 week old. Elrond also has a strong community that is increasing day by day, and it is reasonable to deduct ...
theAsker's user avatar
  • 266
11 votes
Accepted

When you have committed to a proposal and this proposal is deleted, why am I still commited to it?

It's not deleted yet, only closed. It'll be auto-deleted 30 days from its close date, at which point it will also disappear from your profile. Letting everyone go and uncommit because it's now closed ...
animuson's user avatar
  • 736
10 votes
Accepted

Native language should be allow at least in chat groups

This proposal will not work, for several reasons. As mentioned by Ashish and magisch in the comments, it would take a huge amount of money to cover all conceivable languages spoken on Earth (including ...
Adriaan's user avatar
  • 151
10 votes

Changes to the Area 51 Process v3.0

From Closing a Proposal After 4 Months in Definition or Commitment: Do you have a community ready to build your site? We generally expect proposal authors to have access to a community to help ...
Ooker's user avatar
  • 834
10 votes
Accepted

What happens when the commitment percentage reaches 100%

The latter one. The site does not automatically get created at 02:45 on Saturday morning if that's when 100% is reached. Rather, a notice appears saying that this proposal reached 100% commitment and ...
410's user avatar
  • 51
10 votes
Accepted

Can i join the same proposal with multiple accounts?

No, you cannot join using multiple accounts as that would inflate the number inappropriately. If you have two accounts, you can request that they be merged together by contacting us. You may even be ...
animuson's user avatar
  • 736
9 votes
Accepted

What is tactical voting?

"Tactical voting" is an attempt to drive a proposal through at any cost by directing participants to vote optimally and robotically rather than trying to determine if a subject has enough avid users ...
Robert Cartaino's user avatar
9 votes

Area 51 is no longer allowing individual blockchain, cryptocurrency, or web3 proposals

As a former moderator of Ethereum Stack Exchange and a software engineer, I welcome this step. Blockchains are technology, but this does not necessarily mean it creates a large enough developer ...
q9f's user avatar
  • 2,596
9 votes
Accepted

Will another proposal for Stack Overflow in another language be acceptable now?

No, nothing has changed since then and there is still nothing planned. We will not accept entirely non-English site proposals. For future readers: we will announce if this ever changes. We won't ...
animuson's user avatar
  • 736
9 votes
Accepted

Should we allow ChatGPT generated example questions?

No. Stack Exchange is for solving real problems and answering real questions that people have. If a question was generated by an AI, that means that it's not actually a real question/problem that a ...
CDR's user avatar
  • 154

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible