The proposal is aimed at applied scepticism, so it is mainly about debunking pseudoscience and discussing about it. It is not about philosophical discussions about skepticism.
I consider this a sensible approach and I'd like to keep that in the proposal.
I'd like to keep topics that are inevitably leading to discussions, instead of objective Q&A, out of the site. But I realize we probably have different interpretations on what this line means exactly.
I do think that there might be a place for objectively answerable questions about skepticism, but the best place to decide that is probably the beta phase.