Proposal: Islam
Let's face it, any religious site is going to have some kind of prejudice acts going on. But will it be tolerated? I understand "trolling" is not allowed, but what about somebody that truly believes a question that is offensive to a Muslim?
How will this be handled?
For questions like "Is Islam a fake religion?" "Is Islam a religion of terrorists?", as suggested by the OP, they could probably be closed under the category Not A Real Question
not a real question
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.
because the claims are too vague to be answered meaningfully. And if a question is off-topic, it's ok to delete it as offensive, as there's not much harm in deleting an off-topic question.
However, I'd regard questions that were more specific and answerable as different. For example, someone once asked on Skeptics Stack Exchange whether Islam was a moon worshipping cult, and got a detailed answer. If such a question were closed on an Islam Stack Exchange, I'd like to see in the comments section a specific explanation of why it's off topic or offensive.
The short answer is "no".
The scope and purpose of this site is to create a canon of knowledge ABOUT the subject of "Islam." Obviously, we are not checking credentials at the door, but within the scope of this site, users generally do not expect to be challenged on their belief system and, frankly, asking Islamic users to justify their own existence or beliefs is not the purpose of this site.
This stance is more about community building than one of religion or prejudice. For example, we have an Apple site for experts and enthusiast interested in Apple products. It would be "not constructive" if somebody went in there and asked "Why do y'all think Apple is the best when so many more Windows and other users think otherwise?" It's largely irrelevant in the context of the site.
It's the same thing here. That's how you build Q&A sites. That's how you form and preserve community.
So, to answer your question specifically… "How will prejudice (trolling) questions be handled?"
Simply by rigorous community self moderation; by closing these questions as "off topic" or "not constructive."
A small counterpoint to other answers, which seem to assume that offensive questions would also be poor quality. I think it would not be difficult to write legitimate (or seemingly-legitimate) questions that would probably be seen as offensive, or at least extremely uncomfortable, on any forum united around faith or ideology.
On Islam.SE, "Is Islam a religion of terrorists?" would certainly be closed as NARQ, but "What passages in the Quran justify terrorism?" wouldn't be. "Does Islam permit honor killings?" would be another prejudiced question, and it'd be easy to phrase that in an even more inflammatory manner with built-in assumptions, along the lines of the classic "Have you stopped beating your wife?". Aspersions, criticisms and attacks can be phrased in the form of a question. Any debate-team veteran knows that backwards and forwards.
One could construct similarly offensive questions for any major belief, simply by taking for granted that a certain prejudice is widespread, or keying in to unsavory aspects of the rules. Some pretty awful examples include, "A clergyman's been molesting children; how can we move him somewhere else without causing trouble for him?", or "Do the "beautiful captive" laws mean it is permissible for a Jewish soldier to rape Palestinian women?". Etcetera, etcetera.
Stupid questions, spam questions, diatribe questions are easy to deal with. They're off-topic; they get flagged, closed, deleted, burninated. But the format does seem to allow an antagonist to begin some very offensive interrogations, under the auspices of a factual Q&A.
Of course, there's not one-size-fits-all solution to such an attack. It's mostly more intensive mod and community response. A legitimate question can be rephrased more neutrally (and hopefully given some good answers!). A poster who's being deliberately provocative can be dealt with. But figuring out what the precise line is - what questions are challenging but OK, and what's intolerable and deliberately inflammatory - is something that'll be done by the community, on a case-by-case basis. And the bottom line is, yes, this could be a potential problem, and it's something to keep an eye out for.
Stack site is community driven. All members in the Islamic (stack) community will decide what is good or bad. If any question is offensive or off the topic that will be down voted and closed by active community members. Usually the community makes a good justice here. And if a question is very offensive it will be definitely down voted heavily and will be closed. This will indicate the questioner and the readers that this perticular question is very much unwelcomed.
If you truly believe that a question is offensive than do not ask it, you should try to find it else where like in a book or just Google it, who knows someone online might have already asked the question. But if asked than we should tolerate it with peace of mind and not get all angry and stuff, and just remember that the Quran says that the majority of people will never understand. If asked than it should be answered, just in case someone will benefit, no matter how offensive.
...someone that truly believes a question that is offensive to a Muslim?-- I don't understand this statement. How do you believe a question? Are there questions that are off-topic for Muslims to ask and answer?