Well, I would say both yes, but only partially.
Insofar as the part about the site being for scientific questions is concerned, I do think that the title (and especially the site description) make it amply clear. However, I think there are better ways to encapsulate the goal of being a site that caters to Q&A of the technology for bringing about The Solar Revolution.
Now. I want to make it clear that, as an avowed supporter of the pressing need to switch to sustainable and clean energy and of initiatives like The Solar Alliance, I think that we are on the mark with the topic for the site and only disagree on the way we should present this.
That being said, I would like to suggest byhe following regarding this issue :
First of all, I think that there is a broad agreement among the members of this nascent community that solar energy is a necessary and inevitable choice for humanity, and that our site shall hold this as an agreed principle. In that vein, our site shall not be a forum for debate on the merits (relative or otherwise) of solar energy but rather for Q&A about solar energy with the aim of providing first-hand expert answers to questions abd building a database of knowledge about solar.
In this respect I feel that our site's title should be more explicit about this issue. Having a phrase like "Solar Revolution" will go a long way in this regard, in my opinion. I think that this would also help address the issue of global focus for the site, to a certain extent.
I feel that our title is also a bit too big and unfocused at the time. I would suggest that we remove 'economy' from it. Of course, economic aspecys are very important and their discussion should definitely be in topic on the site, but I think that the title should emphasize technology and/or science, if it emphasizes any single aspect of solar at all.
In all, I think that our title could definitely use some improvement, and I would be willing to put up a question in this regard in case there is support from the current community (31 members).