I propose that fantasy "weapons" should probably not be in scope. "Weapons" being any device or machine designed and/or used for war or warlike purposes. Unless they are trying to make comparisons based on very specific things or something special that we can deem appropriate. They will probably be much better represented and researched in the sci-fi SE.

Proposal: Weapons

  • 1
    Are there any example questions on the current proposal that meet your criteria for being excluded? – James Jenkins Mar 11 '17 at 13:44
  • 11
    This seems like the sort of discussion that would be better to have on the site's meta once it's live. – user84544 Mar 12 '17 at 10:10
  • Really, no Quake or Doom weapons?;( – kenorb Jun 3 '17 at 8:21
  • 3
    @kenorb That's already covered under arQAde and The SciFi SE. – Nathan Smith Sep 26 '17 at 21:11
  • So no weapons that we make up? Or is that just me? – Wilco Whiteheart Oct 31 '17 at 3:07

I feel that to be in-scope a weapon has to have real objective characteristics that people can discuss, so if a movie uses a gun or a sword that's "fantasy" but is clearly modified real item, then it could still be discussable. But if it's something like "can adamantium claws cut through mythril armor?" then that belongs elsewhere


I think Maxim has a point with banning questions that have no thought put into them, like "can adamantium claws cut through mythril armor?" This is a question that simply cannot be answered definitively because that is combining two different universes, but I think if there are well defined weapons within a certain universe (e.g. Star Wars), then if well asked, those can be in scope. For example, "Do Blasters have significant recoil in SW?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .