5

Proposal: Safe & Secure

I like this proposal, but perhaps due to too much exposure to old RPGs my brain keeps on trying to autoreplace "Safe & Secure" with "Arms & Armor." Which leads me to think a site by the latter name would be more successful.

In fact, why not merge this and the more advanced Weapons proposal into "Arms & Armor?"

Almost all definition questions so far on Safe & Secure would be on-topic at Weapons. Thinking further: Any question of defense or security is usually posed with reference to some threat, and even virtual tools of attack are colloquially and legally referred to as "arms" and "weapons."

I have a hard time imagining a reason to divide those communities. OTOH, Stack Exchange communities that err on the side of inclusiveness seem to fare much better in beta and graduation.

4

From the Weapons proposal here.

I'm all for it - it seems like there are three proposals that are pretty much the same thing.

It looks like your question is downvoted though - maybe someone should post another opposing view answer. I can't think of any reasons not to as it stands...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .