I support these kinds of questions. As someone who has been employed primarily in the private sector analytical side, this is exactly the kind of horizon-broadening I'd like to get from a community.
I might balk at "What would be a good core textbook" since it's a little too opinion-based in my opinion, but I'd downvote it and comment as opposed to voting to close it if I really disagreed with it.
Which is kind of the attitude I'm hoping to foster... at least in the early days of the beta.
I might ask questions that might seem fringe to you, if I were to ask
For a web-based data visualization on unemployment, is there a better method for calculating and communicating periodicity than building a custom implementation of a Fast Fourier Transform in JavaScript?
It's not strictly related to economics, but if the context of the question is sufficiently tangential, I think in the beginning we really need to encourage it.
Once we, as a community have really defined ourselves, and grown to be self-sustaining, than we can start determining what does and doesn't belong.
What's the difference between Hicksian and Marshellian demand?
, has already been asked (albeit in some sort of non-intuitive way)? ... [As an aside, it seems really unlikely that a college professor would turn to this site for textbook recommendations as opposed to, say, 1. their colleagues 2. textbook reviews in journals 3. personal experience (after all, they're teaching the class), etc.]