3

As the title says really.

Today I have found out that SE had a webdesign.se

Too late to do anything positive as it is now closed.

How does SE advertise a new site? Surely all related SE site members should be informed? Is 10 days sufficient time to create a 'critical mass'? I am logged on to at least one SE site on a more or less daily basis. I have not seen any advertisement, question or comment that linked to WebDesign or am I just unobservant?

Yes I should have supported this site in beta. I apologize to all involved in the WebDesign project.

And on a final note is it possible to reverse the decision?

| |
3

The closure of "Web Design" was not an issue of gaining critical mass (that's typically done in Area 51); it was an issue of scope.

Long story short (yes, we discussed this extensively on the site itself), there simply was not a lot of content that didn't already fit well on our existing sites. With a Graphic Design site for layout and design questions, a UX site for exploring the user interactions, and Stack Overflow to handle all the HTML/CSS/javascript "code" to make it all a reality… putting "web" in front of all those disciplines didn't add much to the network conversation.

I copied over the closure notice here:

I'm Pops, one of the Community Managers at Stack Exchange. Our team spent some time talking about the Web Design beta today, and we have decided to shut it down effective Friday, 3 October 2014.

Two months ago, when this site was a proposal progressing through commitment in Area 51, I outlined some of the team's concerns in the Discussion Zone. Our primary worry was that this site would be based almost exclusively on topics from existing sites, causing "splintering" within the network for those topics without producing any benefit in return. Unfortunately, that seems to have happened. The questions on this site are almost entirely questions that could have been asked elsewhere on the network, where they would have gotten comparable answers. For example:

I picked these four posts by looking at a random list of questions on the site. (To be fair, I did skip some, but most of the ones I skipped could have gone to SO; I just didn't want to have a list that was a dozen items long.)

Now, covering topics that are accepted elsewhere doesn't necessarily make for a bad site — if Web Design clearly met the needs of a distinct group that weren't being well-served anywhere else, we would take that into account. But that's not the case here. Indeed, the hallmark of this community thus far has been an inability to agree on the most fundamental issue: what this site is about. It's not for lack of trying; two thirds of the posts on meta have something to do with scope or topicality. But several of those posts reached no solid conclusions, and most of the ones that did come to conclusions resulted in topics being discouraged or declared out of scope rather than allowed or on-topic.

Not much was going on on the main site while — and perhaps because — the scope issues were being worked on on meta. As I write this, a mere 57 questions are up on the main site, which is pretty low for a week in beta. Whatever the reason, the fact is that the activity just isn't here.

Ultimately, we're not seeing a reason why this site needs to exist as a separate entity from Stack Overflow, User Experience, Graphic Design and other sites already in the network. They already have communities of experts ready to address nearly all of the questions that are being asked here.

As mentioned, the site will remain open until Friday, primarily so that anyone wishing to preserve the excellent questions that did get asked can request their migration to one of the other sites on the network, or archive them by other means.

| |
1

The failed attempt is documented here there is very related site Web Applications as well as Graphic Design

If neither of the existing sites is what you are looking for you are welcome to try again

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .