There have been various discussions about
(1) Framing the site definition. (2) Discussing and voting for an appropriate name. (3) Determining rules for the types of questions best suited to our aims. (4) Expressing concerns about reaching beta stage too quickly.
And so on.
What concerns me now is that there don't seem to be that many people involved in those discussions and not very many votes being cast. Am I wrong to think there need to be more people involved in this aspect as well as just framing questions and hoping we'll get enough ten pointers to carry us over the first hurdle?