Proposal: Earth Science
All geosciences, excluding geomatics, are not exact sciences. That means, that almost any question can have many correct answers, even in the limits of one accepted theory.
There are different theories, answering differently on some key questions. So, the discussions are inevitable.
When the question is looked upon from different point of view, or answerers understood the question differently, it is all OK. But if there are two correct and incompatible answers? The problem I am talking about, is not on voting itself, the asker in most cases anyway will choose one of the answers more useful for him now. The problem is in voting war between representatives of two or more struggling points of view. Just imagine 25 pluses and 25 minuses for both sides and endless discussion that needs heavy moderation?
And it all contradicts with the base standards of stackexchange. What could be done with it?