What statistics are required in private beta in order for the proposed site to pass though to public beta?

Is there a defined set of standards the site must meet, or is a subjective decision made about whether the side should proceed to public beta?


1 Answer 1


There's an answer here on Meta Stack Exchange by former staff member @TimPost. The first sentence is the most important:

I hate to put even arbitrary numbers out there because folks tend to fixate on the numbers instead of the exercise itself.

The purpose of a private beta is to show that:

  • The topic has enough interest to succeed
  • The topic works pretty naturally within the framework of objective Q&A
  • High-quality, original information about the topic is abundant after a short private beta period.

It's the third one that requires a bit of interpretation on our part. If a site has 150 questions with answers that just paraphrase Wikipedia, that site has a problem that would probably cause it to (at the least) be held back in private beta for a while longer.

If a site only manages to get 40 questions but they all have fantastic, in-depth answers, then we'd be very inclined to give it more time and see what happens.

If a site only manages to get 30 - 40 questions, and the quality is just not that great, then we'd probably be letting them know that it just didn't work.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .