Timeline for Why does the proposal include the term serious amateurs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 at 6:16 | comment | added | Canadian Girl Scout | @lkessler Agree! The description is really lame now. I don't find it appealing at all. Change it back!! | |
| Sep 21, 2012 at 2:00 | comment | added | lkessler | Originally, I didn't mind Tom's suggestion, but under further analysis, it just says "For anyone interested" and repeats the title of the site. I think it is better to specify the wide range of people we want to include. I like the original we had. See: discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/a/7611/5074 | |
| Sep 19, 2012 at 19:06 | comment | added | GeneJ | Just asking ... I know there are genealogists with specialities, but are there genealogists who don't "study families by the tracing of ....?" Any chance we can use @TomWetmore's suggested description (above). | |
| Sep 19, 2012 at 18:13 | comment | added | GeneJ | I see that @RobertCartaino updated the site description today. I now reads, "Proposed Q&A site for genealogists who study families by the tracing of their lineages and history." | |
| Sep 16, 2012 at 11:09 | vote | accept | Lou | ||
| Sep 12, 2012 at 21:38 | comment | added | Lorraine W | Works for me as well. | |
| Sep 12, 2012 at 21:16 | comment | added | GeneJ | That does it for me! --GeneJ | |
| Sep 12, 2012 at 18:14 | history | answered | Tom Wetmore | CC BY-SA 3.0 |