Timeline for Am I confused or does this already exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 2, 2014 at 0:02 | comment | added | James S. Cook | Having suffered the seminars of general purpose educators, I can say with some passion that I would absolutely not enjoy being lumped into the larger more vacuous set of general education. | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 22:38 | comment | added | Jason C | @GeoffPointer Again, see my comment on quid's answer. For the purpose of organization; let's keep it there or move it to general question comments. If you have a large comment to make you could also post it as an answer. | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 22:23 | comment | added | Geoff Pointer | @JasonC How much of applied maths and physics content overlaps? Your argument on this is weak. When I did my post graduate course in secondary education there were a wide variety of specialist subjects for the different disciplines. We weren't all just lumped together in one subject. | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 16:53 | comment | added | Jason C | "As for a general Education proposal, it may be too broad." Would you say that none, some, most, or all of what is involved in math education overlaps general education fundamentals and concepts? Would you find more or less value being able to discuss issues with non-math educators? How much of what you personally have to contribute is beneficial in non-math contexts? | |
| Feb 21, 2014 at 13:58 | history | edited | Brian Rushton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 321 characters in body
|
| Feb 21, 2014 at 13:27 | history | answered | Brian Rushton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |